ArticleScientific reports2025
Agricultural carbon footprints, renewable energy and sustainable development in Asia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing concern over environmental degradation and climate change in rapidly developing Asian nations. However, little research has been conducted on the impact of agricultural carbon emissions and renewable energy use on sustainable development outcomes in Asia. This research looks at the relationship between agricultural carbon footprints (ACF), renewable energy consumption (RE), and sustainable development (SD) in nine Asian nations from 2000 to 2022. The study employed the Cross-Sectional Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag (CS-ARDL), Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MM-QR), and Dumitrescu-Hurlin (DH) panel causality techniques to examine the connection. The findings reveal that the relationships vary significantly across the SD distribution. The findings of DH causality indicate bidirectional causality between agricultural carbon footprints and SD, with economic growth primarily driving agricultural emission patterns rather than the reverse. MMQR results demonstrate that agricultural carbon footprints positively impact SD, with effects strongest at lower sustainability levels but diminishing at higher quantiles, suggesting a nonlinear relationship. Trade openness consistently demonstrates negative relationships with SD across all quantiles, while renewable energy shows positive but statistically insignificant effects. Significant country-level heterogeneity emerges, with China and India demonstrating strong Granger causality from agricultural carbon footprints to SD, while other sampled countries show weaker or insignificant relationships. These findings accentuate the need for contextually appropriate policies that recognize the stage-specific relationship between agricultural practices, renewable energy adoption, and sustainable development outcomes in diverse Asian economies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.