Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41038985›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Syringophilid mites parasitising the crows and the competitive exclusion principle.

Maciej Skoracki, Simon Haarder, Markus Unsoeld, Ólafur K Nielsen, Martin Hromada, Bozena Sikora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maciej SkorackiDepartment of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61-614, Poznań, Poland. maciej.skoracki@amu.edu.pl.
Simon Haarder, Vordingborg, Denmark.
Markus UnsoeldSection Ornithology, SNSB-Bavarian State Collection for Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, Munich, Germany.
Ólafur K NielsenNatural Science Institute of Iceland, 210, Garðabaer, Iceland.
Martin HromadaLaboratory and Museum of Evolutionary Ecology, Department of Ecology, Faculty of Humanities and Natural Sciences, University of Prešov, 08001, Prešov, Slovakia.
Bozena SikoraDepartment of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61-614, Poznań, Poland. bozena.sikora@amu.edu.pl.

Funding

Excellence Initiative Program "Mobility" of the UAM Research University UAM ID-UB 094/07/POB1/0013Excellence Initiative Program "Mobility" of the UAM Research University UAM UD-UB 094/07/POB1/0012Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-22-0440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quill mites of the family Syringophilidae (Acariformes: Prostigmata) are one of the most species-rich groups of mite ectoparasites permanently associated with birds, characterised by high host specificity and strict microhabitat preferences. In this study, we examined 179 individuals representing 19 species of the genus Corvus (Passeriformes: Corvidae) to investigate the prevalence and host associations of syringophilid mites. Quill mites were detected in 31 hosts from 11 host species, with infestations restricted exclusively to the wing coverts and involving two species: Syringophiloidus glandarii and Corvisyringophilus krummi. These mites exhibited mutually exclusive host distributions, with the vast majority of corvid species infested by only one of the two mite species. The phylogenetic distribution of these mites across Corvus hosts, combined with their shared microhabitat and lack of co-occurrence, strongly supports historical interspecific competition and subsequent host specialisation, in accordance with the Competitive Exclusion Principle. S. glandarii appears to be the dominant lineage, infecting nine Corvus, while C. krummi was restricted to only three hosts. Only in Corvus albicollis were both mite species detected, though a limited sample size precludes definitive conclusions about stable co-occurrence. These findings highlight how ecological interactions, such as competition, can shape parasite distributions and drive specialisation, even among permanent and highly host-specific parasites. They provide insights into the factors governing host specificity and have implications for understanding ecological and evolutionary patterns in host-parasite systems.

Indexed as

Bird DiseasesCrowsHost-Parasite InteractionsMite InfestationsMitesAnimalsHost SpecificityPhylogenyAcariformesAvesBiodiversityCorvidaeEctoparasitesHost-parasite relationshipQuill mites

Identifiers

PMID41038985
PMCPMC12491569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.