Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41038951›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhanced brain tumour segmentation using a hybrid dual encoder-decoder model in federated learning.

K Narmadha, P Varalakshmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K NarmadhaDepartment of Information Science and Technology, Anna University, Chennai, India. narmk27@gmail.com.
P VaralakshmiDepartment of Information Science and Technology, Anna University, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumour segmentation is an important task in medical imaging, that requires accurate tumour localization for improved diagnostics and treatment planning. However, conventional segmentation models often struggle with boundary delineation and generalization across heterogeneous datasets. Furthermore, data privacy concerns limit centralized model training on large-scale, multi-institutional datasets. To address these drawbacks, we propose a Hybrid Dual Encoder-Decoder Segmentation Model in Federated Learning, that integrates EfficientNet with Swin Transformer as encoders and BASNet (Boundary-Aware Segmentation Network) decoder with MaskFormer as decoders. The proposed model aims to enhance segmentation accuracy and efficiency in terms of total training time. This model leverages hierarchical feature extraction, self-attention mechanisms, and boundary-aware segmentation for superior tumour delineation. The proposed model achieves a Dice Coefficient of 0.94, an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.87 and reduces total training time through faster convergence in fewer rounds. The proposed model exhibits strong boundary delineation performance, with a Hausdorff Distance (HD95) of 1.61, an Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD) of 1.12, and a Boundary F1 Score (BF1) of 0.91, indicating precise segmentation contours. Evaluations on the Kaggle Mateuszbuda LGG-MRI segmentation dataset partitioned across multiple federated clients demonstrate consistent, high segmentation performance. These findings highlight that integrating transformers, lightweight CNNs, and advanced decoders within a federated setup supports enhanced segmentation accuracy while preserving medical data privacy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsFederated LearningHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerBASNetBrain tumour segmentationEfficientNetFederated learningMaskFormerSwin transformer

Identifiers

PMID41038951
PMCPMC12491550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.