Trial reportScientific reports2025
A double-blind, randomized controlled pilot study comparing the safety of intracameral levofloxacin and intracameral cefazolin in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06710977 (A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intracameral Levofloxacin and Intracameral Cefazolin in Cataract Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intracameral Levofloxacin and Intracameral Cefazolin in Cataract Surgery
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postoperative Aqueous Flare in Diabetic Eyes and Fluidics-Related Surgical Parameters After Cataract Surgery Using the Eight-Chop Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the safety of intracameral levofloxacin and intracameral cefazolin in patients undergoing cataract surgery. In this prospective, double-blind, randomized study, patients with senile cataracts who were undergoing phacoemulsification were assigned to receive intracameral levofloxacin (0.1 ml/0.5 mg; Cravit® 0.5%; Santen Pharmaceutical Ltd.) or intracameral cefazolin (0.1 ml/1 mg; generic). The endpoints were the occurrence of endophthalmitis during the 3-month follow-up period, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the presence of anterior chamber (AC) inflammation with grading of AC cells and presence of flare, along with intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), central foveal thickness (CFT), and cell density. A total of 50 patients (50 eyes) were enrolled, randomized, and completed the study. No cases of endophthalmitis were reported in either treatment group. There were no significant differences in BCVA, AC inflammation, IOP, CCT, CFT, or cell density between the groups at any timepoint. Importantly, no dose errors or serious adverse events were reported in either group. This study provides proof of concept that prophylactic intracameral levofloxacin (0.1 ml/0.5 mg) may have a comparable safety profile to intracameral cefazolin (0.1 ml/1 mg) in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Intracameral levofloxacin (0.1 ml/0.5 mg) may offer a viable alternative to cefazolin (0.1 ml/1 mg), particularly for patients with penicillin allergies, while also reducing the risk of dilution errors by eliminating the need for reconstitution. Larger, multicenter studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy of levofloxacin (0.1 ml/0.5 mg) in preventing endophthalmitis.NCT06710977, 02/12/2024, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.