SynthesisScientific reports2025
Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models for imaging detection of hepatic steatosis through systematic review and meta analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of machine learning in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring the landscape of artificial intelligence in dental and maxillofacial radiology: a bibliometric analysis of studies and trends.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Clinician engagement shapes the impact of AI-based ECG screening for chronic liver disease in primary care.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Population-Level Gastroenterology and Hepatology: A Comprehensive Review of Public Health Applications and Quantitative Impact.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Devices in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- AI-driven diagnostic and prognostic models for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: insights from clinical, imaging, and multi-omics studies-a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an increasingly prevalent chronic liver condition affecting nearly 30% of the global population. Characterized by hepatic steatosis in the absence of significant alcohol intake, NAFLD can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although liver biopsy is the diagnostic gold standard, its invasiveness, cost, and associated risks limit widespread application. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising non-invasive alternatives by leveraging large datasets to enhance diagnostic precision. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificialintelligence algorithms for the imaging detection of hepatic steatosis, the essential first step in the metabolic dysfunctionassociated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) spectrum. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2016 and January 2025. Studies were included if they involved adult populations, employed AI algorithms for NAFLD diagnosis, and reported sufficient diagnostic accuracy measures. Quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate random-effects model to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve. Out of 29 studies included in the systematic review, 19 met the criteria for meta-analysis, comprising a total of 344,266 participants. AI-based diagnostic models showed excellent performance, with pooled sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 84-95%), specificity of 92% (95% CI: 86-96%), and an AUC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98). The diagnostic odds ratio was 123.7, indicating high discriminatory capacity. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) demonstrated superior accuracy (AUC = 1.00) compared to other AI classifiers. Subgroup analysis revealed higher diagnostic accuracy in studies validated with imaging standards compared to those using liver biopsy. Model performance was also influenced by the type of classifier and validation method used. AI-based models, particularly CNNs, exhibit high diagnostic accuracy for detecting hepatic steatosis and offer promising non-invasive alternatives to traditional modalities. These tools have the potential to transform early detection and screening, especially in resource-limited settings. Future research should focus on external validation, multicentric trials, and standardized reporting for clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.