Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41038934›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models for imaging detection of hepatic steatosis through systematic review and meta analysis.

V Nivethitha, Roy Arokiam Daniel, Aninda Debnath, Vignesh Dwarakanathan, Girish Jeer, G Kavipriya

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

V NivethithaSchool of Computer Science Engineering (SCOPE), Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Chennai, 600 127, Tamil Nadu, India. nivethitha.v@vit.ac.in.
Roy Arokiam DanielDepartment of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, KK Nagar, Chennai, 600 078, Tamil Nadu, India.
Aninda DebnathDepartment of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India.
Vignesh DwarakanathanDepartment of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, KK Nagar, Chennai, 600 078, Tamil Nadu, India.
Girish JeerCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
G KavipriyaSchool of Computer Science Engineering (SCOPE), Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Chennai, 600 127, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an increasingly prevalent chronic liver condition affecting nearly 30% of the global population. Characterized by hepatic steatosis in the absence of significant alcohol intake, NAFLD can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although liver biopsy is the diagnostic gold standard, its invasiveness, cost, and associated risks limit widespread application. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising non-invasive alternatives by leveraging large datasets to enhance diagnostic precision. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificialintelligence algorithms for the imaging detection of hepatic steatosis, the essential first step in the metabolic dysfunctionassociated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) spectrum. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2016 and January 2025. Studies were included if they involved adult populations, employed AI algorithms for NAFLD diagnosis, and reported sufficient diagnostic accuracy measures. Quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate random-effects model to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve. Out of 29 studies included in the systematic review, 19 met the criteria for meta-analysis, comprising a total of 344,266 participants. AI-based diagnostic models showed excellent performance, with pooled sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 84-95%), specificity of 92% (95% CI: 86-96%), and an AUC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98). The diagnostic odds ratio was 123.7, indicating high discriminatory capacity. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) demonstrated superior accuracy (AUC = 1.00) compared to other AI classifiers. Subgroup analysis revealed higher diagnostic accuracy in studies validated with imaging standards compared to those using liver biopsy. Model performance was also influenced by the type of classifier and validation method used. AI-based models, particularly CNNs, exhibit high diagnostic accuracy for detecting hepatic steatosis and offer promising non-invasive alternatives to traditional modalities. These tools have the potential to transform early detection and screening, especially in resource-limited settings. Future research should focus on external validation, multicentric trials, and standardized reporting for clinical integration.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseAlgorithmsHumansLiverROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkDiagnostic accuracyMeta-analysisNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41038934
PMCPMC12491402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.