ArticleScientific reports2025
A survey of knowledge and perceptions of ADHD and autism spectrum disorder in the workplace at a large corporation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expanding Understanding of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Girls and Women: A New Paradigm.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodevelopmental conditions, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), affect millions globally and are often misunderstood in professional environments. Embracing neurodiversity is essential for inclusivity and leveraging the unique strengths of these individuals. This study evaluated employees' knowledge and perceptions of neurodiversity, focusing on ADHD and autism in large corporations, to identify knowledge gaps and propose strategies to create more inclusive workplaces. Cross-sectional survey of 880 employees from AstraZeneca and Alexion in Spain was conducted in July 2024. It assessed knowledge of ADHD and autism, perceptions of working with neurodivergent individuals, and preferences for educational interventions. Data were collected via self-administered questionnaire and analyzed descriptively and analyzed using descriptive statistics to summarize frequencies, proportions, and central tendency measures. Awareness of ADHD (98.9%) and autism (98.1%) was high, but misconceptions persisted, with ~ 20% misidentifying intellectual disability as a symptom of autism, and restricted interests as a sign of ADHD. Comfort with potentially working with neurodivergent colleagues was rated 7.4/10, yet 60.6% felt that workplaces were inadequately adapted. Preferred educational approaches included school talks (87.5%) and social media (67.6%). Despite positive attitudes, knowledge gaps regarding neurodevelopmental disorders persist. Targeted interventions are essential to emphasize the strengths of neurodivergent individuals and foster adaptable, supportive workplaces that promote inclusivity and innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.