ArticleScientific reports2025
A Geospatial atlas of honey bee forage plants and their distribution patterns in Africa and beyond.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Land-Use Effects on Melliferous Woody Flora in Sudanian Agroforestry Parkland and Protected Area of West Africa.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Honey bee forage plants are essential for bee nutrition and wellbeing, and they also sustain multifunctional landscapes that support human livelihoods and biodiversity. Despite the critical need to conserve them, information on their identity and distribution across Africa remains limited. Through a systematic literature review, we compiled the first continental database of 1,248 honey bee forage plant species from 91 families and retrieved 1,572,790 occurrence records of these species from open-access biodiversity databases like iNaturalist and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). The database includes native and exotic species, with georeferenced records from Africa and beyond. An interactive web-based dashboard accompanies the database, allowing users to visualize species distributions. The dashboard reveals floral report gaps in Western, Central and Northern Africa, helping inform future conservation priorities. In Southern and Eastern Africa where considerable data exists, this resource promotes pollinator-friendly land management practices, supporting honey bees and other pollinators vital for ecosystem resilience. Overall, this resource provides a foundation for future integration with high-resolution imagery, climate models and field-collected data on plant-pollinator interactions to contextualize species distributions under varying land-use and climatic conditions. It offers a valuable tool to support pollinator conservation and climate-resilient strategies for agriculture and beekeeping across Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.