ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance and suitability of wastewater based-surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in public schools.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A framework for evaluating implementation, impact, and cost-effectiveness of wastewater and environmental surveillance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Culture, qPCR, and genome-based surveillance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) for SARS-CoV-2 was a key strategy for epidemiological modelling and informing COVID-19 health policy during the pandemic. We assessed the capacity and performance of SARS-CoV-2 WBS in public schools. Of seventeen schools screened for participation, only four had plumbing systems that were amenable to comprehensive monitoring. From December 2020 to March 2021 composite wastewater collected twice-weekly from these four schools was compared with three municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RTqPCR and fecal biomarkers. Schools had lower rates of successful sample collection relative to WWTPs (64/79 vs. 66/66, p < 0.001). In a time of low COVID-19 activity, 13/64 of school samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2, versus 66/66 for WWTP (p < 0.0001). SARS-CoV-2 RNA in school wastewater was associated with, and often preceded, clinically confirmed COVID-19 cases among students, but showed no correlation with overall rates of student absenteeism. Levels of both SARS-CoV-2 RNA and fecal biomarkers were markedly lower in school wastewater relative to WWTPs. This work demonstrated that WBS for SARS-CoV-2 in schools can be a leading indicator of clinical disease but is technically challenging. The lower fecal biomarker levels from schools suggests children may avoid defecation at school which may further adversely impact school-based WBS for fecal-shed targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.