ArticleScientific reports2025
A multidimensional analysis of the risk of infection with Ehrlichia canis among urban dogs in Iquitos, Peru.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High seroprevalence, clinical predictors, and epidemiological risk factors ofVeterinary world · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ehrlichia canis is a tick-borne bacterium that causes a potentially fatal disease in dogs called canine monocytic ehrlichiosis. In this cross-sectional study, we used a One Health framework to identify statistical associations between E. canis infection in dogs and multiple dog-related, human and environmental factors in Iquitos, Peru. Due to the lack of consensus regarding the positivity threshold for E. canis qPCR assays, we also evaluated if the factors associated with infection remained conserved regardless of the Ct value cut-off used: Ct < 35, a conservative but commonly accepted Ct cut-off for bacterial screening, or Ct ≤ 40, which has been used in several E. canis studies. Under the more conservative scenario, we found that the prevalence of E. canis among dogs was 19.6% (95% CI 15.8-23.9%). Additionally, we showed that risk factor analyses utilizing a qPCR Ct cut-off of 35 or 40 (with conventional PCR confirmation for samples with a Ct > 35) yield comparable results in statistical models, although some differences should be considered. Our findings suggest that in Iquitos, Peru, interventions to prevent E. canis infection should prioritize dogs living in houses with corrugated iron walls. Additionally, comprehensive strategies targeting dogs that have recently traveled and incorporating neutering/spaying and widespread acaricide programs may also prove beneficial. We also discuss the challenges encountered during molecular testing for E. canis detection, highlighting the broader difficulties of studying poorly understood intracellular pathogens in Global South countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.