ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpretable deep learning model diagnoses gastrointestinal stromal tumors and lesion characteristics with microprobe endoscopic ultrasonography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Current status and challenges of artificial intelligence and organoid technologies in precision diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Review
- Uncovering the associative mediation pathway from EUS features to malignancy through pathological mediators in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable predictive model for mismatch between endoscopic ultrasonography and histopathological diagnosis in colorectal subepithelial lesions: a retrospective single-center study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enhancing diagnostic capability of microprobe endoscopic ultrasonography (MEUS) for GISTs is clinical significance. Despite the promise of artificial intelligence (AI) in aiding diagnosis, challenges remain in model interpretability, generalization and diagnostic specificity. To address this, lesion characteristics were integrated into MEUS images to align AI inference with clinical diagnostic workflow, leading to the development of seven deep learning models. The top model, named ECMAI-ME, was assessed in two external validation sets for generalizability and compared with endoscopists in multicenter test for effectiveness. Using 9,229 MEUS images from 873 SELs across five Chinese hospitals, training involved 522 SELs, with 95 and 93 SELs from different sources for external validation, and 163 SELs for a multicenter test. ECMAI-ME achieved an AUC of 0.972 for case classification internally. In two external validation sets, ECMAI-ME maintained consistency diagnostic performance. In multicenter test, ECMAI-ME significantly outperformed endoscopists in accuracy (85.28% vs. 56.44-77.91%, p<0.05) and specificity (89.19% vs. 52.25-72.92%, p<0.001) with comparable sensitivity, and demonstrating high accuracy in distinguishing lesion echogenicity (96.93%), originating layer (88.34%), and echo heterogeneity (77.30%). This interpretable model offers high specificity, adaptability across hospitals and equipment, and strong potential for integration into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.