Trial reportScientific reports2025
Endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation vs. monotherapy for choledocholithiasis in periampullary diverticulum: a randomized trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periampullary diverticulum (PAD) often increases the difficulty of ERCP operation, and there is no standardized treatment strategy. This study compared the efficacy of "small incision + large balloon dilation (EST + EPBD)" with traditional ERCP. 111 patients with PAD complicated with choledocholithiasis were randomly divided into experimental group (n = 55, EST < 5 mm + EPBD) and control group (n = 56, conventional EST/EPBD). The primary endpoints were one-time stone clearance and adverse event rate, while secondary endpoints included operative time and common bile duct pressure. One-time stone clearance rate: test group 98.1% vs. control group 87.5% (P = 0.029) • Mean operation time: 24 ± 9 min vs. 31 ± 11 min (P < 0.001) • CBD pressure 6 days after surgery: 11.5 ± 2.3 vs. 8.5 ± 1.6 cm H₂O (P < 0.001) • Incidence of postoperative pancreatitis: 3.6% vs. 10.7% (P = 0.206). EST + EPBD can significantly improve stone removal efficiency, shorten operation time, and may improve long-term prognosis by preserving Oddi sphincter function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.