Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41038887›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of organ and skeletal physiological characteristics for improved classification of growth-restricted newborn piglets.

Pau Salgado-López, Eudald Llauradó-Calero, Sílvia García-Vilana, David Sánchez-Molina, Albert Brun, Maria Font-I-Furnols, Josep Gasa, David Solà-Oriol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pau Salgado-LópezAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Department of Animal and Food Science, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Eudald Llauradó-CaleroAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Department of Animal and Food Science, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain. eudald.llaurado@uab.cat.
Sílvia García-VilanaPolytechnic School of Engineering of Vilanova i la Geltrú (EPSEVG), Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Av. Víctor Balaguer, 1, Barcelona, 08800, Spain.
David Sánchez-MolinaBarcelona East School of Engineering (EEBE), Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Av. Eduard Maristany, 14, Barcelona, 08019, Spain.
Albert BrunIRTA-Food Quality and Technology, Finca Camps i Armet, Monells, Girona, 17121, Spain.
Maria Font-I-FurnolsIRTA-Food Quality and Technology, Finca Camps i Armet, Monells, Girona, 17121, Spain.
Josep GasaAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Department of Animal and Food Science, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
David Solà-OriolAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNIBA), Department of Animal and Food Science, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.

Funding

Departament de Recerca i Universitats, Generalitat de Catalunya 2023 FI-2 00080Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Gobierno de España PID2019-103915GB-100NextGenerationEU 2023 INV-2 00076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of potentially slow-growing pigs at birth, using both external and internal traits, would enable the early implementation of targeted management and feeding strategies to optimize herd management and improve production efficiency. Twenty-four piglets from six hyperprolific sows were classified into four categories based on birth body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), and crow-to-rump length (CRL): severe intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR), low birth weight (LBW), moderate birth weight (MBW), and high birth weight (HBW). Organ weights, computed tomography (CT) measurements, bending tests to assess tibial mechanical and geometric properties, and tibial mineral content analysis were performed to evaluate organ and skeletal physiological characteristics. Severe IUGR piglets exhibited higher brain-to-organ ratios and relative brain weights, which decreased linearly across categories. High birth BW piglets demonstrated 70% more bone volume and a greater proportion of high-density bones than sIUGR piglets, along with the largest cortical area and thickness in tibia measurements. On the other hand, sIUGR showed higher maximum stress, stiffness values, and manganese content in their tibiae compared to other categories. These findings reveal that piglets with varying degrees of IUGR prioritize brain development, exhibit asymmetrical organ growth, and experience impaired ossification and longitudinal bone growth. This study underscores the need to incorporate complementary birth indicators to refine the classification of newborn piglets with different degrees of restriction.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesFetal Growth RetardationAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBirth WeightBone DensityBrainFemaleOrgan SizeSwineTibiaTomography, X-Ray ComputedBending testsComputed tomographyIntrauterine growth restrictionMineral contentOrgan and skeletal physiological characteristicsSwine

Identifiers

PMID41038887
PMCPMC12491405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.