Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41038886›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Consistency between self-reported and log data to understand students' experience of learning in flipped classrooms.

Feifei Han, Jingpeiyi Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Feifei HanGriffith Institute for Educational Research, Griffith University, Level 2, Macrossan Building (N16), Nathan Campus, Brisbane, QLD, 4111, Australia. feifei.han@griffith.edu.au.
Jingpeiyi YangSchool of Foreign Languages, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, 650233, China. jingpeiyiyang@swfu.edu.cn.

Funding

Southwest Forestry University (SWFU) 20250711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although flipped classrooms have been increasingly adopted in higher education, there is a lack of investigations on the interrelations between students' perceptions of learning environment, learning approach and time, and academic achievement in flipped classrooms. This study examined the extent to which the relations between students' perceptions of learning environment, academic achievement, and learning approach and time measured by self-reported and log data were consistent among 271 Australian undergraduates. The self-reported data identified two clusters of students reporting using either deep or surface learning approach more frequently. Students who reported using deep approach more frequently also obtained higher academic achievement. The log data also identified two clusters of students using either a preparation-oriented or an assessment-oriented learning approach, with the preparation-oriented learners having higher academic achievement than the assessment-oriented learners. Students with more or less favourable perceptions of learning environment demonstrated differences in their learning approach and time though the differences were not consistent across the self-reported and log data. While learning approach and time measured by both types of data significantly and positively predicted course marks; the observed learning approach and time could explain more variance in students' course marks. These results seemed to suggest that log data could be more sensitive and accurate indicators of learning approach and time. To foster high quality learning in flipped classrooms, teachers should raise students' awareness of the importance of pre-lecture online learning activities and design assessment tasks aligning learning activities.

Indexed as

LearningProblem-Based LearningSelf ReportStudentsAcademic SuccessAdolescentAustraliaEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultFlipped classroomsLearning approach and timePerceptions of learning environmentSelf-reported data, log data

Identifiers

PMID41038886
PMCPMC12491635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.