Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41038882›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The impact of confounders, spillovers and interactions on social distancing policy effects estimates.

José Ramón Enríquez, Horacio Larreguy, Alberto Simpser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José Ramón Enríquez *Graduate School of Business and Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, USA. jrenriquez@stanford.edu.
Horacio Larreguy *Departments of Economics and Political Science, ITAM, Mexico City, 01080, Mexico.
Alberto Simpser *Center for Economic Research and Department of Political Science, ITAM, Mexico City, 01080, Mexico.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-EURE-0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social distancing policies have been widely used to curb the spread of infectious diseases such as COVID-19, but assessing their effectiveness is challenging. This study shows that widely-used methods to estimate the effects of such policies, like Two-way Fixed Effects and Difference-in-Differences, are highly sensitive to accounting, or failing to account, for the simultaneous adoption of policies and the presence of spillovers across geographies stemming from human movement. By estimating a series of nonparametric models on fine-grained mobility, epidemiological, and policy data from Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic, this research shows that failing to consider confounders, interactions, and spillovers can change the magnitude and the sign of estimated policy effects, hampering the design of optimal public policies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Physical DistancingPublic PolicyConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicHumansMexicoPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19MexicoPolicy-interactionsSocial Distancing PoliciesSpillovers

Identifiers

PMID41038882
PMCPMC12491577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.