ArticleScientific reports2025
Pythagorean fuzzy MAIRCA CRITIC for energy price and demand forecasting involving eco economic factors for sustainable economy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel reinforcement learning-based approach for short-term load and price forecasting in energy markets.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sustainable economies require effective energy planning that goes beyond relying on functioning forecasting models to comprehend energy dynamics, and also provides well-defined decision-making (DM) models that can address risk, ambiguity, and conflicting eco-economic objectives. This type of strategic planning requires an integrated assessment approach that can evaluate forecasting choices in an uncertain and dynamic environment. This paper presents a new and modified methodology for ranking energy forecasting models within a Pythagorean Fuzzy Set (PFS) system by integrating the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Inter-Criteria Correlation) weighting framework and the MAIRCA (Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis) ranking scheme. In the suggested framework, expert uncertainty and vagueness are represented by the PFS environment. In contrast, some of the leading eco-economic indicators are objectively weighted using CRITIC, and forecasting model alternatives are prioritized based on MAIRCA. A comparative study is conducted on a hypothetical data set that represents realistic energy system capabilities, including adaptability, carbon policy integration, and computing efficiency. The findings suggest that the framework contributes to consistent, interpretable, and uncertainty-aware rankings, and the Deep Q-Network (DQN) model was ranked to be the most effective alternative. The study contributes to the development of more sophisticated decision-support mechanisms to facilitate sustainable energy planning, enabling informed and balanced decisions as the eco-economic climate evolves rapidly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.