ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrated machine learning analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic data identifies healing associated targets in diabetic wound repair.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time to Heal: MicroRNA Temporal Dysregulation in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Wound-Heart Axis: Can Chronic Wounds Contribute to Cardiac Dysfunction?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Inflammation and wound healing: a comprehensive overview of mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and translational perspectives.Biomarker research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study identified biomarkers that could be leveraged to classify the state of healing in diabetic wounds. Firstly, by collecting wound samples from diabetic mice at different time points and generating their protein profiles using standard techniques, we set to interrogate whether a small number of biomarkers could serve as sensors to monitor the healing stage. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was applied. Large-scale analysis of wound tissue proteins integrated with the respective wound sizes allowed to establish a correlation between the observed protein profile and wound closure. We further evaluated human subjects' systemic serum proteomics for biomarkers. An additional wound healing model in diabetic mice was employed for microRNA quantitation at the same time points and similarly analyzed. Our analysis highlighted markers MMP-2, HGF, miR-1b and miR-107-3p in mice and Fractalkine and FGF-2 in humans that could correctly identify the extent of healing. By using proteomics from mice and human patients and complementary microRNA mouse data with computer regression models we can better predict molecular and protein deficits associated with impaired diabetic wound repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.