ArticleScientific reports2025
Transformer-enhanced vertebrae segmentation and anatomical variation recognition from CT images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation and anatomical classification of vertebrae in spinal CT scans are crucial for clinical diagnosis, surgical planning, and disease monitoring. However, the task is complicated by anatomical variability, degenerative changes, and the presence of rare vertebral anomalies. In this study, we propose a hybrid framework that combines a high-resolution WNet segmentation backbone with a Vision Transformer (ViT)-based classification module to perform vertebral identification and anomaly detection. Our model incorporates an attention-based anatomical variation module and leverages patient-specific metadata (age, sex, vertebral distribution) to improve the accuracy and personalization of vertebrae typing. Extensive experiments on the VerSe 2019 and 2020 datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines such as nnUNet and SwinUNet, especially in detecting transitional vertebrae (e.g., T13, L6) and modeling morphological diversity. The system maintains high robustness under slice skipping, noise perturbation, and scanner variations, while offering interpretability through attention heatmaps and case-specific alerts. Our findings suggest that integrating anatomical priors and demographic context into transformer-based pipelines is a promising direction for personalized, intelligent spinal image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.