Trial reportScientific reports2025
Systemic enzyme therapy for postoperative inflammation and wound healing after orthopedic surgery: a randomized, placebo and active controlled clinical study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Diosmin, Cumarin and Arbutin in Reducing Edema and Pain After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of EnMax tablets in managing postoperative inflammation and supporting wound healing following orthopedic surgery. A total of 105 patients were randomized to receive EnMax, a comparator enzyme formulation (trypsin-bromelain-rutoside), or placebo alongside standard care for 7 days. Baseline characteristics were statistically comparable across all groups. EnMax demonstrated significant clinical benefits, including substantial reductions in pain (93.10%), inflammation (89.77%), and key inflammatory biomarkers-C-reactive protein (CRP, 57% reduction) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, 61.32% reduction) by the final visit. EnMax also outperformed both placebo and the comparator in reducing erythema, local irritation, discharge, and tenderness. Notably, EnMax patients required less analgesic use and reported no adverse events, with full study compliance. In contrast, the placebo group exhibited minimal improvement across all measured parameters. These results suggest that EnMax is a promising, safe, and effective therapeutic option for enhancing postoperative recovery. Additional larger, long-term studies are recommended to further establish its clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.