Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41038371›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2025

Deep learning method for semi-automated segmentation of optic nerve head tissues in optical coherence tomography images.

Kelly A Clingo, Cameron A Czerpak, Harry A Quigley, Thao D Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelly A ClingoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. Electronic address: kclingo1@jhu.edu.
Cameron A CzerpakDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Harry A QuigleyWilmer Ophthalmological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Thao D NguyenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA; Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.

Funding

Wilmer Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY001765 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jiang Qian · 1985 to 2026
$22.1M
PATHOGENESIS OF GLAUCOMATOUS OPTIC NERVE DAMAGER01EY002120 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI QUIGLEY, HARRY ALAN · 1985 to 2025
$12.6M
Biomechanics of the Human Optic Nerve Head for Glaucoma Biomarkers.R01EY036042 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Thao D Nguyen · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001765NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002120NEI NIH HHS R01 EY036042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables acquisition of image volumes of the optic nerve head (ONH) in vivo. These image volumes provide structural and biomechanical information about the ONH. The individual tissues in these images must be segmented to obtain tissue-specific information, but doing so manually is time consuming. We present a method which uses a deep learning model to semi-automatically segment the following tissue boundaries of the ONH: the anterior lamina cribrosa surface (ALCS), Bruch's membrane (BM), and choroid-scleral interface (CS). We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict tissue boundary locations using 46 pre-processed ONH image volumes consisting of 24 radial scans each and their corresponding manual segmentations. When the trained model is presented with a new image, a user is able to accept the model's predictions or drag any misplaced markings to their correct locations. These corrected or accepted markings are used to update the model's predictions for subsequent images. The root mean squared error (RMSE) was used to evaluate the difference between the updated model's predictions and the manually marked segmentations. The RMSE was found to be 8.98 ± 14.74 μm for the BM, 24.26 ± 17.96 μm for the CS, and 49.69 ± 32.08 μm for the ALCS. Updating the model improved predictions for the BM and CS for our test set consisting of image volumes of 6 ONHs, with 24 scans per ONH. A more complete evaluation of the updated model's effect on prediction accuracy could be obtained using a larger test dataset.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOptic DiskTomography, Optical CoherenceBruch MembraneChoroidHumansNeural Networks, ComputerScleraDeep learningDigital volume correlationGlaucomaImage segmentationLamina cribrosaOptical coherence tomographyOptic nerve head

Identifiers

PMID41038371
PMCPMC12820890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.