ArticleExperimental eye research2025
Deep learning method for semi-automated segmentation of optic nerve head tissues in optical coherence tomography images.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables acquisition of image volumes of the optic nerve head (ONH) in vivo. These image volumes provide structural and biomechanical information about the ONH. The individual tissues in these images must be segmented to obtain tissue-specific information, but doing so manually is time consuming. We present a method which uses a deep learning model to semi-automatically segment the following tissue boundaries of the ONH: the anterior lamina cribrosa surface (ALCS), Bruch's membrane (BM), and choroid-scleral interface (CS). We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict tissue boundary locations using 46 pre-processed ONH image volumes consisting of 24 radial scans each and their corresponding manual segmentations. When the trained model is presented with a new image, a user is able to accept the model's predictions or drag any misplaced markings to their correct locations. These corrected or accepted markings are used to update the model's predictions for subsequent images. The root mean squared error (RMSE) was used to evaluate the difference between the updated model's predictions and the manually marked segmentations. The RMSE was found to be 8.98 ± 14.74 μm for the BM, 24.26 ± 17.96 μm for the CS, and 49.69 ± 32.08 μm for the ALCS. Updating the model improved predictions for the BM and CS for our test set consisting of image volumes of 6 ONHs, with 24 scans per ONH. A more complete evaluation of the updated model's effect on prediction accuracy could be obtained using a larger test dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.