Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41037806›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Expanding the Design Space for Fall Prevention in Acute Orthopedic Hospital Care: Human-Centered Design Study.

Maria Ehn, Åsa Revenäs, Helena Tobiasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria EhnSchool of Innovation, Design and Technology, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5179-7158
Åsa RevenäsOrtopedic Clinic Västerås, Västerås Hospital, Region Västmanland, Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-9292
Helena TobiassonSchool of Innovation, Design and Technology, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9595-3044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn-hospital fall prevention is a complex phenomenon most efficiently addressed via a wide range of multifactorial interventions. Technology may contribute, but research in this field has so far mainly focused on detecting falls. As a result, new knowledge from a system perspective is needed regarding when and how new technologies may support fall prevention among patients who have been hospitalized.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore and describe clinical practices in an acute orthopedic hospital ward for fall prevention from a system perspective; determine the needs and possibilities related to support for clinical practices for fall prevention; and test whether a framework for studying interactions between people, activities, contexts, and technologies can be used to support observations of complex phenomena such as clinical fall prevention.

methodsThis qualitative study followed the principles of human-centered design while combining focused ethnography with a workshop. Eight health care professionals representing different staff categories in an acute hospital ward of an orthopedic clinic participated in on-site interviews or were observed in their clinical practice. Data from these events were subjected to qualitative content analysis to describe the clinical practices for fall prevention observed in terms of people, activities, context, and tools. In a workshop, a larger group of clinic personnel provided their views on fall prevention, described the activities and tools they observed to prevent falls, and discussed needs for further support.

resultsThis study determined that health personnel considered fall prevention in all their interactions with patients, which included a wide range of activities for fall prevention wherein staff categories played complementary roles. These staff-patient meetings were goal oriented, responsive, and patient centered. The staff often served as key "tools" in assessment, communication, and coaching, while digital tools (mainly computer-based software programs) were used for information retrieval, documentation, and communication. The personnel worked to prevent patient falls both during hospitalization and after discharge. They believed that the long-term perspective was much more difficult to address in their clinical practice, and they expressed a need for more homelike environments in the hospital.

conclusionsThe view on technology-based in-hospital fall prevention can be broadened not only to mainly include monitoring and alarm systems, information systems in general, or computer-based information in particular systems but also to support activities performed by health personnel that engage patients in fall prevention. For example, tools such as these can be implemented in training involving daily activities and mobility within safe yet more homelike clinical contexts.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsHospital Design and ConstructionOrthopedicsUser-Centered DesignHumansQualitative Researchfallshospitalinteractionpreventiontechnology

Identifiers

PMID41037806
PMCPMC12531586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.