ArticleJMIR medical education2025
Beyond Chatbots: Moving Toward Multistep Modular AI Agents in Medical Education.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI Agents and the Future of Clinical Judgment in Medical Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Need for Human-Centered Integration.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: The integration of large language models into medical education has significantly increased, providing valuable assistance in single-turn, isolated educational tasks. However, their utility remains limited in complex, iterative instructional workflows characteristic of clinical education. Single-prompt AI chatbots lack the necessary contextual awareness and iterative capability required for nuanced educational tasks. This Viewpoint paper argues for a shift from conventional chatbot paradigms toward a modular, multistep artificial intelligence (AI) agent framework that aligns closely with the pedagogical needs of medical educators. We propose a modular framework composed of specialized AI agents, each responsible for distinct instructional subtasks. Furthermore, these agents operate within clearly defined boundaries and are equipped with tools and resources to accomplish their tasks and ensure pedagogical continuity and coherence. Specialized agents enhance accuracy by using models optimally tailored to specific cognitive tasks, increasing the quality of outputs compared to single-model workflows. Using a clinical scenario design as an illustrative example, we demonstrate how task specialization, iterative feedback, and tool integration in an agent-based pipeline can mirror expert-driven educational processes. The framework maintains a human-in-the-loop structure, with educators reviewing and refining each output before progression, ensuring pedagogical integrity, flexibility, and transparency. Our proposed shift toward modular AI agents offers significant promise for enhancing educational workflows by delegating routine tasks to specialized systems. We encourage educators to explore how these emerging AI ecosystems could transform medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.