ArticleAge and ageing2025
Social inequalities in the use of formal and informal home care in older women: evidence from a large UK cohort study.
Article in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social and Health Conditions That Drive the Need and Demand for, Use of and Expenditure on Social Care in the UK: A Systematic Review.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAt a time when access to publicly funded social care is constrained relative to need, older people with care needs with the least resources may disproportionately rely on informal care.
methodsIn 2020-21, 66,604 participants from the UK Million Women Study were invited to complete an online survey, which included questions on pre-pandemic receipt of home care. Responses were combined with data collected at recruitment in 1998, a 2010 re-survey, and hospital admissions in 2017-19. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between education level and area deprivation quintile with formal or informal care use, with adjustment for pre-disposing characteristics (age), enabling resources (household composition and size) and care need (including self-rated health and co-morbidities).
resultsA total of 44,523 women completed the survey; 43,756 were eligible for analysis (mean age 75.6). A total of 1407 (3.2%) received informal care, 544 received formal care (1.2%) and 255 (0.6%) received both. Compared to those with university degrees, those with no qualifications were more likely to receive informal care (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84) and less likely to receive formal care (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.25-0.60). The most deprived were more likely to receive informal care (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.09-1.65) compared to the least deprived, and there was a trend across quintiles (Ptrend = .02).
conclusionThis is the largest UK study to assess variation in social care use by education and deprivation. We found inequities in care that may disadvantage older women in deprived areas and with lower levels of education, and their informal carers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.