Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41037594›Full record

ArticleHealth physics2025

Dose Assessment for Wood Fuels and Their Ashes Available in Austria.

Viktoria Herzner, Christian Katzlberger, Christoph Pfeifer, Martin Weigl-Kuska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Viktoria HerznerAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Department for Technical Radiation Protection, Vienna, Austria.
Christian KatzlbergerAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Department for Technical Radiation Protection, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph PfeiferBOKU University, Department of Natural Sciences and Sustainable Resources, Institute of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
Martin Weigl-KuskaHolzforschung Austria, Unit Circular Economy, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiological risk to the public due to the use of wood ash as a fertilizer in gardens. Dose assessment is a process in radiation protection that involves determining the amount of radiation to which a person or population has been exposed. It helps to evaluate potential health risks more effectively to ensure that radiation exposure remains within safe limits. Three pathways were considered: inhalation of ash, ingestion of locally produced food fertilized with ash, and direct ingestion of ash. It was assumed that a 0.01 cm, 0.5 cm, or 1-cm-thick layer of ash is used for fertilization per year and that half of the vegetables consumed annually come from one's own garden. The dose assessment for a member of the public older than 17 y using the highest concentrations of 137Cs and 90Sr measured in 27 wood (logs, chips, briquettes, and pellets) ash samples and fertilization with 0.01 cm of ash results in a calculated dose of 3.02 ± 0.24 μSv y-1. The primary exposure pathway is the ingestion of locally produced foods fertilized with wood ash. Besides radionuclides, ash also contains concentrated non-combustible components, including potentially harmful minerals, salts, heavy metals, and organic pollutants. These substances are found in particularly higher concentrations in ash from wood pellets and briquettes than in log and chip ash, so its use as fertilizer---especially in vegetable gardens---should be carefully considered.

Indexed as

FertilizersRadiation ExposureWoodAustriaCesium RadioisotopesHumansRadiation DosageRadiation MonitoringRisk AssessmentCesium RadioisotopesFertilizersdose assessmentfood chain

Identifiers

PMID41037594
PMCPMC12482363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.