ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025
Auditory-Perceptual Validation of Acoustic Chaos Parameters in Healthy and Dysphonic Voices.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Part 2: A Protocol.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Minimal Perturbation-Based Segment Selection in Connected Speech Differentiates Healthy and Pathological Voice.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2026Article
- Performance of Nonlinear Energy Difference Ratio and Voice Type Component Profile Across Phoneme, Relative Sound Pressure Level, and Environment.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUnderstanding the correlation between objective acoustic measurements and auditory-perceptual scales is essential for improving voice assessment methods. This study examines the relationship between voice type component profile (VTCP) and weighted index of dysphonia (WID) with the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain Scale (GRBAS), and Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) scales across both healthy and dysphonic voices.
methodAudio samples used in this study were acquired using a publicly available Perceptual Voice Qualities Database. Pearson correlations were conducted between VTCP metrics and GRBAS and CAPE-V scales. To determine the pathological significance of these measures,
resultsResults indicated that VTCP metrics have significant correlations with GRBAS and CAPE-V scales. VTC1 exhibited the strongest correlation with dysphonia grade and severity, reinforcing its role in representing overall voice quality. VTC4 demonstrated high correlations with breathiness, pitch, and overall severity, highlighting its significance in characterizing turbulent vocal signals. WID, representing a composite measure of VTCP parameters, was highly correlated with dysphonia grade and severity, further underscoring its potential clinical utility. Comparisons between CAPE-V and GRBAS revealed strong correlations, suggesting that both scales effectively capture similar perceptual dimensions of dysphonia, despite differences in rating methods. VTC1, VTC4, and WID emerged as the strongest indicators of pathology.
conclusionsThese findings support VTCP as a valuable objective measure of voice production, closely aligning with established perceptual assessment tools. The results highlight VTCP's potential for clinical implementation in dysphonia evaluation, complementing existing auditory-perceptual scales to enhance diagnostic precision and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.