Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41037308›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2025

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET-Guided Intensification of Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Colin Belliveau, Fred Saad, Danny Duplan, Claire Petit, Guila Delouya, Daniel Taussky, Maroie Barkati, Carole Lambert, Marie-Claude Beauchemin, Sebastien Clavel and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03525288 (PSMA-PET Guided Radiotherapy in Patients With High-Risk, Recurrent, or Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03525288 phase2 / phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

PSMA-PET Guided Radiotherapy in Patients With High-Risk, Recurrent, or Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2018 to 2027Enrolled130ConditionsProstate CancerArmsPSMA -PET/CT simulation, Standard-care simulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Colin BelliveauRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Fred SaadUrology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Danny DuplanDépartement de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Claire PetitRadiotherapy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Guila DelouyaRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Daniel TausskyRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Maroie BarkatiRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Carole LambertRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Claude BeaucheminRadiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sebastien ClavelDépartement de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Gary MokDépartement de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Levon IgidbashianDépartement de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Anne-Sophie Gauthier-ParéDépartement de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Thu-van NguyenRadiation Oncology, Hôpital de Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, Canada.
Pierre-Yves McLaughlinRadiation Oncology, Hôpital de Gatineau, Gatineau, Québec, Canada & University of Ottawa, Division of Radiation Oncology.
Khun Visith KeuNuclear Medicine, Hôpital de la Cité-de-la-Santé, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Jean N DaSilvaRadiochemistry and Cyclotron Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM).
Daniel JuneauNuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Cynthia MénardRadiation Oncology, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) offers superior accuracy in detecting prostate cancer lesions leading to intensified radiotherapy (RT), but its impact on patient outcomes is still undefined. Objective: To evaluate whether intensification of salvage RT (SRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) guided by PSMA-PET (PSMAiSRT) is associated with improved failure-free survival (FFS). Design, Setting, and Participants: PSMAiSRT was a stratified cohort within a larger PSMA-guided intensification of radiotherapy (PSMAgRT) trial, a phase 2, two-center, registry-based randomized clinical trial. Patients with biochemical recurrence following RP who were eligible for standard-of-care (SOC) SRT from May 2018 to February 2021, were eligible for randomization in the PSMAiSRT stratum. A total of 130 patients were randomized, with 2 who did not proceed to radiotherapy (RT). The cutoff date for the primary analysis was October 26, 2023. Intervention: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SOC SRT to the prostate bed, with or without elective pelvic RT, with or without adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT), or PSMA-PET/CT-guided SRT, intensified to detected sites of disease. Main outcome and measures: The primary end point was FFS, defined as PSA progression (PSA nadir >0.2 ng/mL), radiological progression, next-line therapy initiation, or death. Results: Among 128 patients (median [IQR] age, 71 [64-74] years), median (range) PSA at enrollment was 0.3 (0.1-3.0) ng/mL. In the PSMAiSRT group, 33 of 64 patients (52%) received intensified SRT; with addition of pelvic RT (n = 16 [25%]), metastasis-directed RT (n = 2 [3%]), lymph node boost (n = 19 [30%]), or prostate bed boost (n = 15). Adjuvant hormone therapy was equally prevalent in both arms (55 [86%] control vs 54 [84%] PSMAiSRT). At a median (range) follow-up of 37 (7-60) months, PSMAiSRT improved FFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94; P = .04) and eugonadal FFS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.96; P = .03), with its greatest benefit in the subgroup with PSA of 0.3 ng/mL or more (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.79; P = .01). Fewer next-line treatment events occurred in the PSMAiSRT arm (4 vs 12; HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-1.02; P = .04). There were no significant differences in toxic effects or quality of life between arms. Conclusion and Relevance: This phase 2 trial demonstrated an isotoxic improvement in cancer control with PSMA-PET-guided intensification of SRT after RP. Confirmatory evidence is awaited from a subsequently accrued phase 3 trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03525288.

Indexed as

Antigens, SurfaceGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIPositron-Emission TomographyProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedSalvage TherapyAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstate-Specific AntigenAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID41037308
PMCPMC12581501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.