Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41037289›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2025

Vitreous Floaters Functional Questionnaire for Vision-Degrading Myodesopsia From Vitreous Floaters.

Justin H Nguyen, Stefaniya K Boneva, Jeannie Nguyen-Cuu, Kenneth M Yee, Fei Yu, Alfredo A Sadun, J Sebag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justin H NguyenVMR Consulting Inc, Huntington Beach, California.
Stefaniya K BonevaVMR Consulting Inc, Huntington Beach, California.
Jeannie Nguyen-CuuVMR Consulting Inc, Huntington Beach, California.
Kenneth M YeeVMR Consulting Inc, Huntington Beach, California.
Fei YuCenter for Community Outreach and Policy, Department of Ophthalmology, Stein and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Alfredo A SadunDoheny Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Pasadena.
J SebagVMR Consulting Inc, Huntington Beach, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Vision-degrading myodesopsia (VDM) from vitreous floaters can be associated with degraded contrast sensitivity and poor visual quality of life, although it is unclear how to best evaluate subjective patient disturbances. Floater-specific, vision-related, patient-reported outcomes might improve assessment of disease severity and case selection for therapy as well as provide useful outcome measures of present and future treatments. Objectives: To develop a Vitreous Floaters Functional Questionnaire (VFFQ) and to determine if the VFFQ score correlates with vitreous density measured by quantitative ultrasonography and with visual function evaluated by measuring contrast sensitivity. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a single-center cross-sectional study, Rasch analysis was performed in 169 participants with floaters. Test-retest reliability at 3 time points over 6 months was performed in 24 other participants. Correlations of the VFFQ score with contrast sensitivity and quantitative ultrasonography were performed in a separate group of 224 participants. Data analysis was performed from 2017 to 2024. Exposures: Participants completed the self-administered questionnaire and underwent ultrasonography, measures of contrast sensitivity, and clinical evaluation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Contrast sensitivity (Freiburg Acuity Contrast Test), Cook distance, intraclass correlation, quantitative ultrasonography, Rasch analysis, and VFFQ composite score were measured. Results: From 169 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.5 [14.4] years; 74 [43.8%] female), Rasch analysis eliminated 8 questions and identified 23 questions meeting acceptable criteria for the VFFQ. The intraclass correlation of Rasch-calibrated composite scores from 24 participants (mean [SD] age, 56.0 [13.5] years; 14 [58.3%] female) who completed the 23-item VFFQ (VFFQ-23) on 3 occasions found high test-retest reliability (0.850 [95% CI, 0.721 to 0.928]; P < .001). Clinical correlations were evaluated among 224 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [15.0] years; 99 [44.2%] female). There were significant correlations between VFFQ-23 scores and both vitreous echodensity (r = -0.752 [95% CI, -0.805 to -0.688]; P < .001) and contrast sensitivity (r = -0.744 [95% CI, -0.799 to -0.677]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The VFFQ-23 had high test-retest reliability and correlated with vitreous structure and visual function. This vision-related patient-reported outcome of disease severity in patients with vitreous floaters might be useful for individual patient evaluations, population screening and triage, and assessing the response to current therapies, like vitrectomy and YAG laser vitreolysis, and future therapies, such as nanoparticle treatments and pharmacologic vitreolysis.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesQuality of LifeVision DisordersVisual AcuityVitreous BodyAdultAgedContrast SensitivityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSickness Impact ProfileSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41037289
PMCPMC12492297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.