Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41037274›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2025

The Definition of Cure in Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 15 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Alessandro Pastorino, Heshan Liu, Levi Pederson, Valentino Martelli, Timothy Iveson, Aimery de Gramont, Steven R Alberts, Thomas J George, Greg Yothers, Andrea Harkin and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2026.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Alessandro PastorinoIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Medical Oncology Unit 1, Genova, Italy.
Heshan LiuDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Levi PedersonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Valentino MartelliIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Medical Oncology Unit 1, Genova, Italy.
Timothy IvesonUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Aimery de GramontDepartment of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Institute, Levallois-Perret, France.
Steven R AlbertsDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Thomas J GeorgeUniversity of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville.
Greg YothersDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Andrea HarkinGlasgow Oncology Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Roberto LabiancaOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Julien TaiebDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, CARPEM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Hans-Joachim SchmollKlinik fur Innere Med IV University Clinic Halle (Saale), Halle Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany.
Chris TwelvesUniversity of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Norman WolmarkUPMC Hillman Cancer Center University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Leonard B SaltzMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ioannis SouglakosDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Richard M GoldbergWest Virginia University Cancer Institute and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown.
Rachel KerrAdjuvant Colorectal Cancer Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sara LonardiVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Takayuki YoshinoDepartment of Global Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Alberto PucciniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Thierry AndréDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sorbonne Université, Hospital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Qian ShiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Alberto SobreroIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Medical Oncology Unit 1, Genova, Italy.
ACCENT/IDEA Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The definition of cure in stage II to III colon cancer (CC) remains unclear due to limitations in conventional end points, which include deaths and second primary tumors as events. These can complicate communication with patients regarding long-term outcomes. Objective: To distinguish relapses from competing health-related events to classify long-term outcomes years after surgery and explore when the incidence of true relapses of the initial CC approaches 0% to define cure in this disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from 15 phase 3 randomized clinical trials assessed time to CC-related relapse using Kaplan-Meier and Aalen-Johansen methods, with death and second primary tumors treated as competing risks. Cox regression models evaluated prognostic associations, stratified by sex, stage, and tumor. Patients with stage II to III CC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy were included. All patients had undergone radical surgery for CC and received adjuvant chemotherapy with a median follow-up of at least 6 years. The Adjuvant Colon Cancer Endpoints (ACCENT) and the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) databases included adjuvant studies conducted between 1996 and 2015. Data were analyzed from February 2022 to June 2025. Exposures: Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens varied across trials, including fluoropyrimidines alone or in combination with oxaliplatin or biologic agents. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to CC-related recurrence. The predefined threshold for cure was a recurrence risk below 0.5%. Results: Of 35 213 included patients, 19 346 (54.9%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 60.2 (10.8) years. The incidence rate of recurrence peaked at 6.4% (1993 of 31 373) between month 6 and month 12 and decreased continuously until year 10 of follow-up never exceeding 0.5%. Recurrence rate appeared to increase again after year 10 and peaked at 2.0% during year 12.5 to year 13, a pattern observed exclusively in the MOSAIC trial. Competing-event analysis revealed that death and second primary tumors inflated the apparent recurrence rate, especially for older patients. The overall cumulative incidence of relapse with death as competing risk was lower among female patients (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.76; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this pooled analysis of phase 3 randomized clinical trials, a recurrence rate less than 0.5% occurred after 6 years from surgery, supporting a practical definition of cure. Recognizing this milestone may improve patient communication, guide follow-up duration, and reduce unnecessary long-term surveillance.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41037274
PMCPMC12492296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.