ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Characterization of gut microbiota dysbiosis in breast cancer patients.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the characteristics of gut microbiome changes in lung cancer patients and healthy controls.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Host-microbiome interactions in breast cancer progression and treatment response.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile lifestyle factors are known to be associated with breast cancer development, the potential role of the gut microbiome, which is influenced by lifestyle, as a risk factor is not well understood. We conducted a comparative analysis of the intestinal microbiota between healthy individuals and breast cancer patients to investigate the potential impact of gut microbiome composition on breast cancer development. This study aimed to explore the role of intestinal microbial communities in breast cancer pathogenesis.
methodsWe conducted a comparative analysis of fecal 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data from 100 individuals in the general population and 79 breast cancer patients. We investigated the differences between the two groups in terms of relative abundance, absolute quantity, diversity, and functionality of the gut microbiota.
resultsBreast cancer groups showed higher levels of Firmicutes and lower levels of Bacteroidota at the phylum level, and an increase in Fusobacteriota was found in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer group. Additionally, certain genera were more or less common in breast cancer groups at the genus level. The study also indicated lower gut microbiota diversity and loss of heterogeneity in breast cancer groups and reduced functional genes and pathways.
conclusionCompared to the general population, breast cancer patients exhibited a distinct dysbiosis in their gut microbiota. Further investigation is warranted to determine if this dysbiotic state, linked to a predicted downregulation of functional pathways critical for homeostasis, plays a role in breast cancer development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.