ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2025
Deep Neural Network-Based Risk Prediction of Glioblastoma Multiforme Recurrence.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop and evaluate deep neural network (DNN) models for accurately predicting the recurrence risk of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) to enhance individualized treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes. This study implemented DNN architectures optimized using a hybrid differential evolution neural network (HDE-NN) framework to forecast GBM recurrence risk, particularly in patients at advanced disease stages. The models were trained and validated on a multimodal dataset comprising genomic profiles, imaging-derived metrics, and longitudinal clinical records from 780 GBM patients. Data were sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and institutional repositories. Performance was benchmarked against conventional machine learning models, including support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), and standard DNNs. The models were implemented in Python. The proposed HDE-optimized DNN achieved an accuracy of 94%, precision of 92%, recall of 90%, F1 score of 91%, and an AUC-ROC of 0.96. These metrics significantly outperformed baseline models, with improvements of 6-12% across evaluation criteria. Confidence intervals (95%) were computed via tenfold cross-validation, confirming statistical robustness. This research introduces a high-performance and generalizable deep learning framework for GBM recurrence prediction. By incorporating multi-source clinical and genomic data, the model demonstrates superior predictive capacity over traditional methods. These findings support the integration of AI-driven tools into GBM care workflows to improve prognosis assessment and personalize therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41037206What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.