ArticleOral radiology2026
Influence of periapical radiographs with different vertical angulations and digital filters on horizontal root fracture diagnosis: an in vitro study.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the influence of the number of periapical radiographs with different vertical angles of the X-ray beam and the impact of digital enhancement filters on the diagnosis of horizontal root fracture (HRF).
methodsTwenty-four single-rooted teeth, 12 with HRF and 12 without HRF, composed the sample. For the first evaluation, periapical radiographs of the teeth were acquired individually with the VistaScan
resultsThe area under the receiver operator curve, sensitivity, and negative predictive values were lower when HRF was diagnosed with only one radiograph (p < 0.05) compared to two or three radiographs, which did not differ among themselves (p > 0.05). There were no differences between the images evaluated in different filter conditions (p > 0.05). Intra- and inter-examiner agreement ranged from moderate to almost perfect and fair to substantial, respectively.
conclusionsEvaluation of two radiographs with different vertical angulations improves the diagnosis of HRF and is recommended. The use of VistaScan
Indexed as
Identifiers
41037190What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.