ArticleBrain informatics2025
A gender-aware saliency prediction system for web interfaces using deep learning and eye-tracking data.
Article in Brain informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how demographic factors influence visual attention is crucial for the development of adaptive and user-centered web interfaces. This paper presents a gender-aware saliency prediction system based on fine-tuned deep learning models and demographic-specific gaze behavior. We introduce the WIC640 dataset, which includes 640 web page screenshots categorized by content type and country of origin, along with eye-tracking data from 85 participants across four age groups and both genders. To investigate gender-related differences in visual saliency, we fine-tuned TranSalNet, a Transformer-based saliency prediction model, on the WIC640 dataset. Our experiments reveal distinct gaze behavior patterns between male and female users. The female-trained model achieved a correlation coefficient (CC) of 0.7786, normalized scanpath saliency (NSS) of 2.4224, and Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) of 0.5447; the male-trained model showed slightly lower performance (CC = 0.7582, NSS = 2.3508, KLD = 0.5986). Interestingly, the general model trained on the complete dataset outperformed both gender-specific models, highlighting the importance of inclusive training data. Statistical analysis revealed significant gender-related differences in 9 out of 12 saliency features and a trend of reduced fixation dispersion with increasing age. While this study does not yet incorporate temporal gaze modeling, the results suggest practical benefits for intelligent systems aiming to personalize user experiences based on demographic features. The WIC640 dataset is publicly available and offers a valuable resource for future research on adaptive AI systems, visual attention modeling, and demographic-aware interface design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.