ReviewProtoplasma2026
Shedding light on deception: LAMP as a tool for detecting adulterants in herbal medicine.
Review in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integrity of herbal products is frequently undermined by both intentional and unintentional adulteration, leading to substantial health risks and economic losses. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a DNA-based molecular technique, has emerged as a formidable solution due to its simplicity, specificity, sensitivity, and ability to operate under isothermal conditions. The review critically evaluates the application of LAMP in authenticating herbal materials, showcasing its enhanced efficiency and user-friendliness compared to conventional techniques. The LAMP technique employs four to six primers that target six to eight distinct regions of the target DNA, ensuring unparalleled specificity. The amplification at a constant temperature negates the need for thermal cyclers, thus rendering it highly suitable for point-of-care applications and field-based authentication. The article presents case studies that illustrate LAMP's efficacy in detecting adulteration across traditional medicines, dietary supplements, and crude drug materials. Visualization methods in LAMP, such as turbidity, colorimetry, and fluorescence, greatly enhance its accessibility and ease of use, making it well-suited for both laboratory and field applications. Although there are limitations, such as primer design complexity and contamination risks, recent innovations, including the use of lyophilized reagents, multiplexing capabilities, and integration with mobile detection platforms, are significantly advancing the practicality of LAMP assays. This review underscores the potential of LAMP in both regulatory and commercial contexts, promoting the authenticity, safety, and quality of herbal products, thereby making a vital contribution to consumer protection and the sustainability of the herbal medicine trade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41037144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.