Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41037136›Full record

SynthesisSurgery today2026

Back to the battlefield: minimally invasive management of postcholecystectomy remnants: a systematic appraisal of safety and efficacy.

Alessia Fassari, Edoardo Rosso, Maleyko Mohamed-Wais, Jyoti Lakshmi Anafack, Sonia Ursino, Vito De Blasi

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessia FassariDepartment of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 4 Rue Ernest Barblé, L-1210, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. alessia.fassari@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8534-9823
Edoardo RossoCentre de Chirurgie Digestive, Pôle Santé Sud, 28 Rue de Guetteloup, 72100, Le Mans, France.
Maleyko Mohamed-WaisUniversité de Liège, Pl. du Vingt Août 7, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Jyoti Lakshmi AnafackDepartment of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 4 Rue Ernest Barblé, L-1210, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Sonia UrsinoDepartment of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 4 Rue Ernest Barblé, L-1210, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Vito De BlasiDepartment of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 4 Rue Ernest Barblé, L-1210, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS) may result from either subtotal cholecystectomy or unintentional incomplete resection, leading to remnant gallbladder or residual cystic duct pathology. This scenario often presents years later, complicated by lithiasis that is not amenable to endoscopic treatment and prior surgery performed via laparotomy, typically due to difficult anatomy. Thus, reoperation becomes a technically demanding scenario, revisiting a surgical battlefield shaped by dense adhesions and distorted landmarks. We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review across five databases, including studies with five or more patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic reoperation for remnant gallbladder or cystic ducts. Data on the surgical approach, complications, conversion, and symptom resolution were collected and analyzed descriptively. Nineteen studies (443 patients) were included (407 laparoscopies and 36 robotic surgeries). The overall morbidity rate was 9.0%; conversion to open surgery occurred in 3.6% of the patients in the laparoscopic group. The robotic subgroup showed no conversions and a slightly lower morbidity (5.6%) than the laparoscopic cohort. The symptom resolution rate was 98.4%. Reoperations are often indicated after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Minimally invasive reoperation is feasible and safe in select cases of PCS, even in hostile surgical fields. Robotics offers enhanced precision and visualization and is particularly valuable in reoperative biliary surgery. Prospective studies are needed to determine optimal indications.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeConversion to Open SurgeryCystic DuctHumansLaparoscopyReoperationSafetyTreatment OutcomeBiliary surgeryGallbladder remnantMinimally invasive surgeryPostcholecystectomy syndromeRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.