ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Initial adaptation and surgical performance of the hinotori™ robotic system among pediatric surgeons with minimal robotic exposure.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transforming thyroid disease education: AI and virtual technologies in residency training.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the ability of the hinotori™ system to mitigate technical and ergonomic challenges in pediatric laparoscopy by comparing usability, suturing precision, and stress responses with that of conventional laparoscopy in a simulated infant abdomen.
methodsTen pediatric surgeons with limited robotic experience performed peg transfer and suturing in a 1,400-mL box model simulating a 6-month-old abdomen, using robotic-assisted (Robo) and laparoscopic (Lap) approaches in a crossover design. Performance was assessed using the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) score and the A-Lap Mini platform, which evaluates suturing accuracy across five domains. Physiological stress (heart rate and salivary amylase levels) and subjective fatigue (Chalder Fatigue Scale and visual analog scale) were recorded.
resultsPeg-transfer FLS scores were comparable between Robo and Lap (497.5 vs 531), with progressive improvement across Robo trials. Robotic suturing demonstrated greater air-leak resistance, smaller wound openings, and fewer internal collisions. Stress and fatigue indices did not differ significantly, although trends favored Robo.
conclusionPediatric surgeons with minimal robotic experience achieved higher suturing precision using hinotori™, suggesting intuitive usability and potential safety-related benefits in training. Owing to the small sample size, absence of resident-level validation, and lack of formal performance-stress correlation, confirmation in larger cohorts is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.