Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41037067›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

Saad Alshahrani, Amany Ahmed Soliman, Ashraf H Abdellatif, Abd El-Fattah Al Sheikh, Ayman Mohammed Abdulmohaymen, Mosab A A Alzubier

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saad AlshahraniDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia. s.alshahrani@psau.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6981-8052
Amany Ahmed SolimanDepartment of Urology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ashraf H AbdellatifDepartment of Urology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abd El-Fattah Al SheikhDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ayman Mohammed AbdulmohaymenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mosab A A AlzubierDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-6306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare urothelial malignancy. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the standard of care for UTUC. Use of robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) has grown to be the favored approach for management of UTUC. The present study aimed to compare operative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) and RANU in studies with matched and unmatched cohorts. The present study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Selected keywords and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms were used to search Web of Science, Scopus and Pubmed databases for relevant literature. Quality of studies included in this work were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for cohort studies. Extracted data were statistically analyzed and presented using Revman software. The 21 studies included in this meta-analysis were conducted on 32,882 patients. They comprised 22,624 patients (68.8%) who underwent LNU and 10,258 patients (31.2%) who underwent RANU. There were 7 studies that compared matched cohorts (19,984 patients, 60.8%) and 14 studies that compared unmatched groups (12,898 patients, 39.2%). RANU was associated with shorter duration of hospital stay in studies with matched cohorts, [mean difference (95% CI): 1.65 (0.49-2.81)], studies with unmatched cohorts [mean difference (95% CI): 0.93 (0.35-1.50)], and in all studies [mean difference (95% CI): 1.13 (0.66-1.60)]. Also, it was found that RANU was associated with significantly higher odds of lymph node dissection in the matched cohorts' studies [OR (95%): 0.58 (0.43-0.79)], unmatched cohorts' studies [OR (95%): 0.39 (0.30-0.51)] and all studies [OR (95% CI): 0.44 (0.35-0.55)]. Pooled analysis of all studies, studies with matched cohorts and studies with unmatched cohorts found that LNU and RANU had comparable operative duration, frequency of positive surgical margin, frequency of intraoperative complications, frequency of overall postoperative complications and frequency of hospital readmission. Discrepancies existed between different subsets regarding harvested lymph nodes count, estimated blood loss, major postoperative complications, postoperative blood transfusions and postoperative mortality. RANU had shorter hospital stay and higher odds of lymph node dissection. Also, RANU had comparable operative duration, frequency of positive surgical margin, frequency of intraoperative complications frequency of overall postoperative complications and frequency of hospital readmission when compared with LNU regardless cohorts matching.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellKidney NeoplasmsLaparoscopyNephroureterectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreteral NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsHumansLength of StayTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopic nephroureterectomyRobot-assisted nephroureterectomyUpper-tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.