ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Predictive models of weakness among older adults: the contribution of oral health indicators.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor oral health can negatively impact overall health and quality of life. Understanding how oral health predicts weakness in older adults is critical, since weakness increases the risk of health outcomes. However, the predictive role of oral health indicators in weakness among older adults remains unclear. This study assessed the ability of oral health indicators to predict weakness using data from Brazil's EpiFloripa Aging cohort study. Predictive validity was evaluated in a sample of older adults participating in the cohort's second (n = 440) and third (n = 347) waves. Self-reported sociodemographic, general health, and oral health variables were analyzed, with weakness diagnosed using cut-off points for handgrip strength. Predictive models incorporating sociodemographic, general health, and oral health variables were tested. Receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity and specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Approximately 45.9% of the participants had two to three compromised oral health indicators during the second wave, and the five-year incidence of weakness was 31.9%. Oral health indicators and the oral frailty score did not enhance the prediction of weakness compared to models based solely on demographic, socioeconomic, and general health variables. However, models including oral health indicators demonstrated predictive accuracy comparable to those with demographic, socioeconomic, and general health variables. Sensitivity values were low (3.70-6.48%), while specificity values were high (>99%), with accuracy ranging from 0.64 to 0.71. These findings suggest that oral health indicators offer comparable predictive validity for weakness as sociodemographic and general health models, potentially serving as useful tools for health teams in screening older adults for weakness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.