Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036861›Full record

ArticlemSphere2025

Differences in GenBank and RefSeq annotations may affect genomics data interpretation for

Guilherme Marcelino Viana de Siqueira, Thomas Eng, Aindrila Mukhopadhyay, María-Eugenia Guazzaroni

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guilherme Marcelino Viana de SiqueiraDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, State of São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3645-6363
Thomas EngThe Joint BioEnergy Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Emeryville, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-3863
Aindrila MukhopadhyayThe Joint BioEnergy Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Emeryville, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-7425
María-Eugenia GuazzaroniDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, State of São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4657-3731

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 304089/2023-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/25432-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/01748-5U.S. Department of Energy DE-AC02-05CH11231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annotations of genomic features are cornerstone data that support routine workflows in conventional omics analyses in

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidGenome, BacterialGenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationPseudomonas putidaOpen Reading FramesGenBankgenome annotationsPseudomonas putidaRefSeq

Identifiers

PMID41036861
PMCPMC12570471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.