ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2025
Identifying Factors Influencing the Implementation of Early Intervention Services for Psychosis in Quebec, Canada: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Providers' Perspectives.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Religiosity and Engagement in Early Intervention Programme for First-Episode Psychosis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Implementing Coordinated Specialty Care Programs for Psychosis Across the U.S.: State-Level Administrator and Provider Perspectives.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Identifying Factors Influencing the Implementation of Early Intervention Services for Psychosis in Quebec, Canada: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Providers' Perspectives.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEarly intervention services for psychosis are clinically and cost-effective. Despite the availability of national and international guidelines and well-identified essential components of high-quality services, the implementation of early intervention services varies greatly. However, factors underpinning this are poorly understood and infrequently studied. In Quebec, the provision of earmarked funding and political support since 2017 has resulted in widespread dissemination of early intervention, which presented a valuable context to examine what shapes and influences the implementation of early intervention for psychosis.
methodsAn online survey was sent to leaders of all early intervention programmes (n = 33) in Quebec to assess service organisation and delivery. The survey's qualitative component included open-ended questions about factors impacting implementation, which are the focus of this report. Deductive and inductive thematic analysis was conducted through multiple iterations to reach consensus.
resultsTwenty-seven programmes responded to the questionnaire. Factors influencing implementation were separated into eight themes: human resources, workload, finances, physical resources, training, service delivery, service users and relationship with management. Every theme and subtheme was represented as a potential barrier or facilitator, with work atmosphere, quality of the clinic's premises, and management buy-in of early intervention more frequently noted as facilitators.
conclusionFactors at the organisational, service and staff levels affect the implementation of early psychosis programmes. Despite political support and increased funding, insufficient funding and its consequences, along with limited implementation supports, remain important barriers to successful implementation. Rapid learning health systems can provide effective feedback to programmes to identify strategies to overcome identified barriers and enhance understanding of interactions between the identified factors. Lived experiences perspectives should also be included in future implementation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.