ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Trends in and Determinants of Approval Lag for Anticancer Drugs in Japan and the US: Role of Multi-Regional Trials and Concurrent Approvals.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Japanese Subpopulation Data and Overall Survival in Pivotal Trials on Oncology Drug Approvals in Japan.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Trends in and Determinants of Approval Lag for Anticancer Drugs in Japan and the US: Role of Multi-Regional Trials and Concurrent Approvals.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely access to treatment for cancer patients requires the accelerated approval of new anticancer therapies. However, the lengthy pharmaceutical approval process in Japan has contributed to what is known as "drug lag." Although recent efforts to promote international multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) involving Japan and to advance strategies for concurrent approval in Japan and the United States have helped shorten time to approval, the individual effects of these approaches have not been fully quantified. This study analyzed trends in the timing of drug application, review, and approval for anticancer agents approved in Japan and the United States, and evaluated the influence of MRCT participation, concurrent approval, company origin, cancer type, and regulatory programs through multivariate analysis. We examined 142 anticancer agents approved between October 2004 and March 2025 by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The median approval lag was 774 days (interquartile range: 217-1370), but decreased markedly to about 100 days by the 2020s. Approval lag was significantly shorter for drugs developed through MRCTs and those approved concurrently in both countries (both p < 0.001), whereas company origin, cancer type, and regulatory program use were not significantly associated (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MRCTs and concurrent approval were independently associated with shorter approval lag. These findings support early international development and synchronized submission timing to further reduce approval lag. They provide updated evidence based on recent data and offer novel insights by quantifying the effects of MRCT implementation and concurrent approval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.