Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036683›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2025

Trends in and Determinants of Approval Lag for Anticancer Drugs in Japan and the US: Role of Multi-Regional Trials and Concurrent Approvals.

Hitoshi Kanno, Kotone Matsuyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hitoshi KannoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3500-9921
Kotone MatsuyamaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-0984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely access to treatment for cancer patients requires the accelerated approval of new anticancer therapies. However, the lengthy pharmaceutical approval process in Japan has contributed to what is known as "drug lag." Although recent efforts to promote international multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) involving Japan and to advance strategies for concurrent approval in Japan and the United States have helped shorten time to approval, the individual effects of these approaches have not been fully quantified. This study analyzed trends in the timing of drug application, review, and approval for anticancer agents approved in Japan and the United States, and evaluated the influence of MRCT participation, concurrent approval, company origin, cancer type, and regulatory programs through multivariate analysis. We examined 142 anticancer agents approved between October 2004 and March 2025 by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The median approval lag was 774 days (interquartile range: 217-1370), but decreased markedly to about 100 days by the 2020s. Approval lag was significantly shorter for drugs developed through MRCTs and those approved concurrently in both countries (both p < 0.001), whereas company origin, cancer type, and regulatory program use were not significantly associated (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MRCTs and concurrent approval were independently associated with shorter approval lag. These findings support early international development and synchronized submission timing to further reduce approval lag. They provide updated evidence based on recent data and offer novel insights by quantifying the effects of MRCT implementation and concurrent approval.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug ApprovalMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicHumansJapanTime FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic Agentsclinical trialsoncologyregulatory

Identifiers

PMID41036683
PMCPMC12489741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.