ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Leading and lagging strand abasic sites differentially affect vertebrate replisome progression but involve analogous bypass mechanisms.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging drivers of DNA repeat expansions.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abasic sites are frequent DNA lesions that interfere with replication and exert complex biological effects because they can be processed into other lesions. Thus, it remains poorly understood how abasic sites affect replisome progression, which repair pathways they elicit, and whether this depends on the template strand damaged. Using Xenopus egg extracts, we developed an approach to analyze replication of DNA containing a site-specific, stable abasic site on the leading or lagging strand template. We show that abasic sites robustly stall DNA synthesis but exert strand-specific effects. Leading strand abasic sites stall leading strands at the lesion, while lagging strands stall downstream at template-dependent positions. We conclude that replisomes uncouple at leading strand lesions, then stall due to additional template constraints. Synthesis restarts upon lesion bypass or when a converging fork triggers termination. In contrast, lagging strand abasic sites stall only lagging strands, indicating replisome progression was unaffected. Lagging strands reprime downstream, generating a post-replicative gap that is subsequently filled. Despite different effects on replisome progression, both leading and lagging strand abasic sites require translesion DNA synthesis for bypass. Our results reveal how strand-specific abasic sites differentially affect replication and demonstrate that uncoupled replisomes are susceptible to downstream template constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.