Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036529›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025

Test-retest reliability of a novel unilateral thoracic expansion measurement using stretchable strain sensors.

Motoki Yamanaka, Kazuki Yamaguchi, Keiji Asada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Motoki YamanakaGraduate School of Health Science, Suzuka University of Medical Science: 1001-1 Kishioka-cho, Suzuka, Mie 510-0293, Japan.
Kazuki YamaguchiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Japan.
Keiji AsadaGraduate School of Health Science, Suzuka University of Medical Science: 1001-1 Kishioka-cho, Suzuka, Mie 510-0293, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] We report here a new method for measuring unilateral thoracic expansion using stretchable strain sensors. In this study, we assessed the test-retest reliability of this method and compared left and right thoracic expansions in healthy males. [Participants and Methods] Thirty healthy males (mean age, 30.1 ± 7.4 years) participated in this study. Two strain sensors were placed on the lateral walls of the thorax at xiphoid process level. Participants were asked to take three deep breaths, and the change in sensor length from the position at maximal expiration to that at maximal inspiration was recorded. These measurements were simultaneously performed on left and right sides. Unilateral thoracic expansions were calculated to assess differences between the maximal expiratory and inspiratory positions for each deep breath. The test-retest reliability of the unilateral thoracic expansion was then examined. [Results] Test reliability was excellent for both first and second datasets. Retest reliability was also excellent. The minimum detectable change (MDC) in the retest was 3.31 mm. [Conclusion] This newly developed method for measuring thoracic expansion is sufficiently reliable. No differences in thoracic expansion were observed between left and right sides in healthy males.

Indexed as

Strain sensorTest-retest reliabilityThorax

Identifiers

PMID41036529
PMCPMC12483484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.