ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Differences in hip and knee muscle strength between successful and unsuccessful performances of the single leg sit to stand test from a 20-cm-high box in healthy young adults.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To investigate differences in knee and hip muscle strength between successful and unsuccessful single leg sit to stand tests from a 20-cm-high box (SLST 20) in healthy young adults. [Participants and Methods] Sixty-six lower limbs from 33 healthy adults (20 males, 13 females; mean age 25.4 ± 3.4 years) were classified into successful and unsuccessful groups. Isokinetic strength of the knee (flexion/extension at 60°/s) and hip (flexion/extension/abduction/adduction at 30°/s) was measured. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using sex as a covariate. Stratified analyses were also performed. [Results] The successful group had significantly greater strength in knee flexion/extension, hip flexion, and hip adduction. ANCOVA revealed that knee flexion and extension were significantly associated with SLST 20 performance, whereas hip strength was not, after adjusting for sex. Among females, hip adduction strength was significantly greater in the successful group, with no significant difference observed in males. [Conclusion] Knee strength is crucial for SLST 20 performance, and hip adduction strength may be important, particularly in females. Therefore, sex-specific assessments and training strategies should be considered in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.