ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Assessing rhythm reproducibility during gait after internal rhythm-learning tasks: a pilot study in healthy adults and patients with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To investigate the feasibility of a new rhythm-learning task using internal cues in healthy individuals and patients with Parkinson's disease. [Participants and Methods] This study included 27 healthy individuals and six patients with Parkinson's disease. All participants first learned rhythms through either stepping or tapping tasks. Subsequently, they attempted to reproduce the learned rhythms while walking. The relative rhythm reproducibility error was calculated by comparing the target rhythm with the rhythm generated during walking. Experiment 1 examined the effects of task type and rhythm condition in healthy individuals, whereas Experiment 2 focused on the effects of stepping-based rhythm-learning task in patients with Parkinson's disease. [Results] In healthy participants, rhythm reproducibility errors differed significantly depending on task type and rhythm condition. Stepping produced more accurate walking rhythms than tapping. Patients with Parkinson's disease who had lower scores on the Frontal Assessment Battery and longer completion times on the Trail Making Test Part B tended to show reduced rhythm reproducibility. [Conclusions] This rhythm-learning task using internal cues could be applied to individuals with Parkinson's disease. The findings suggest a possible association between the ability to learn rhythmic patterns internally and frontal lobe cognitive function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.