ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Effects of short- and long-term vibration therapy on maximum voluntary isometric contraction and muscle activity in quadriceps and antagonist muscles.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Vibratory stimulation is used to restore motor function in patients with residual motor impairments. However, to date, no studies have examined its effects on both the stimulated and antagonist muscles at different intervention time points. We thus examined the effects of short- and long-term vibratory stimulation on maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) and electromyography (EMG) of the quadriceps and antagonist muscles. [Participants and Methods] A crossover design was employed with 18 healthy male participants who performed maximal knee extensions and flexions under three separate conditions: control, short-term vibration stimulation (15 s), and long-term vibration stimulation (5 min). The rectus femoris was stimulated at a vibration frequency of 108 Hz. MVIC was evaluated in the quadriceps and antagonist muscles, and EMG was recorded during MVIC assessment. EMG analysis included the integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and median frequency (MF). [Results] Knee extension MVIC did not differ significantly between control and short-term vibration groups. However, it was significantly increased in the long-term vibration group relative to the control group. No differences in IEMG and MF were observed. [Conclusion] In this study, an increase in knee extension MVIC was observed after 5 min of rectus femoris stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.