Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036513›Full record

ArticleHumanities & social sciences communications2025

The wellbeing framework for consumer experiences in the circular economy of the textile industry.

Bruna Petreca, Carey Jewitt, Aikaterini Fotopoulou, Lili Golmohammadi, Ricardo O'Nascimento, Lucy Chamberlin, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Marianna Obrist, Sharon Baurley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Humanities & social sciences communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bruna PetrecaRoyal College of Art, London, UK.
Carey JewittUniversity College London, London, UK.
Aikaterini FotopoulouUniversity College London, London, UK.
Lili GolmohammadiUniversity College London, London, UK.
Ricardo O'NascimentoRoyal College of Art, London, UK.
Lucy ChamberlinNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Nadia Bianchi-BerthouzeUniversity College London, London, UK.
Marianna ObristUniversity College London, London, UK.
Sharon BaurleyRoyal College of Art, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conspicuous consumption, driven by immediate satisfaction, novelty, and status, contradicts the Circular Economy's (CE) goals of reducing consumption and waste. As the CE evolves into a global mission supported by legislation, it must address overconsumption by adopting a humanist, design-focused, participatory approach that fosters alternative cultures of consumption. This paper investigates the potential of leveraging human wellbeing as a strategic approach to achieving circular sustainable consumption of textiles. It proposes that strengthening the connection between human wellbeing and material resource flow, particularly through a garment's lifecycle, can aid in reducing the textile consumption necessary for a successful CE. The 'Wellbeing framework for consumer experiences in the circular economy of the textile industry' positions consumer wellbeing as essential for the circular value chain of textiles. It serves as a cornerstone for designing consumer experiences that support a CE, informs alternative narratives for the industry and society, and has the potential to influence policy. The Framework is grounded in a comprehensive literature review examining how consumer wellbeing can drive the social health benefits of circularity, foster new sustainable consumption cultures, and serve as a consumer-centric tool for achieving zero waste through responsible and personalised engagement with consumption, reuse, and recycling. The iterative literature review and interdisciplinary elaboration followed five stages: review, selection, empirical testing, synthesis, and abstraction to achieve the final framework. The Framework comprises 16 wellbeing dimensions clustered into three categories: being well, feeling well and doing well. The primary contribution of this framework is its holistic approach to integrating and balancing the hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions of wellbeing within the context of the CE. It conceptualises wellbeing as a dynamic temporal process that evolves throughout the consumption journey, encompassing moments of both satisfaction and challenge, and addresses social factors such as the embodied experiences and self-perception elicited by a garment.

Indexed as

PsychologySociology

Identifiers

PMID41036513
PMCPMC12479345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.