ArticleHumanities & social sciences communications2025
The wellbeing framework for consumer experiences in the circular economy of the textile industry.
Article in Humanities & social sciences communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The wellbeing framework for consumer experiences in the circular economy of the textile industry.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conspicuous consumption, driven by immediate satisfaction, novelty, and status, contradicts the Circular Economy's (CE) goals of reducing consumption and waste. As the CE evolves into a global mission supported by legislation, it must address overconsumption by adopting a humanist, design-focused, participatory approach that fosters alternative cultures of consumption. This paper investigates the potential of leveraging human wellbeing as a strategic approach to achieving circular sustainable consumption of textiles. It proposes that strengthening the connection between human wellbeing and material resource flow, particularly through a garment's lifecycle, can aid in reducing the textile consumption necessary for a successful CE. The 'Wellbeing framework for consumer experiences in the circular economy of the textile industry' positions consumer wellbeing as essential for the circular value chain of textiles. It serves as a cornerstone for designing consumer experiences that support a CE, informs alternative narratives for the industry and society, and has the potential to influence policy. The Framework is grounded in a comprehensive literature review examining how consumer wellbeing can drive the social health benefits of circularity, foster new sustainable consumption cultures, and serve as a consumer-centric tool for achieving zero waste through responsible and personalised engagement with consumption, reuse, and recycling. The iterative literature review and interdisciplinary elaboration followed five stages: review, selection, empirical testing, synthesis, and abstraction to achieve the final framework. The Framework comprises 16 wellbeing dimensions clustered into three categories: being well, feeling well and doing well. The primary contribution of this framework is its holistic approach to integrating and balancing the hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions of wellbeing within the context of the CE. It conceptualises wellbeing as a dynamic temporal process that evolves throughout the consumption journey, encompassing moments of both satisfaction and challenge, and addresses social factors such as the embodied experiences and self-perception elicited by a garment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.