Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036489›Full record

ArticleISME communications2025

The

David Vázquez-Arias, Cristina Civantos, David Durán-Wendt, Adrián Ruiz, Rafael Rivilla, Marta Martín, Patricia Bernal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Plant-Endophyte Cross-Talk inMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Virulence regulation in the fish pathogenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David Vázquez-AriasDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin, 2, Madrid 28049, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6703-7340
Cristina CivantosDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida de la Reina Mercedes, 6, Sevilla 41012, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9947-3144
David Durán-WendtDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin, 2, Madrid 28049, Spain.
Adrián RuizDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida de la Reina Mercedes, 6, Sevilla 41012, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-1976
Rafael RivillaDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin, 2, Madrid 28049, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-2939
Marta MartínDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin, 2, Madrid 28049, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-9768
Patricia BernalDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida de la Reina Mercedes, 6, Sevilla 41012, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6228-0496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial competition mechanisms drive microbial community dynamics across diverse ecological niches. The type VI secretion system (T6SS) represents a sophisticated nanomachine used by Gram-negative bacteria for contact-dependent elimination of competitors through the delivery of toxic effectors. While the T6SS has been well-documented in mammalian gut microbiota development, its role in shaping plant rhizosphere communities remains poorly understood despite the ecological importance of rhizosphere microbiota. This study investigates how the three

Indexed as

biocontrol agentinter-bacterial competitionmicrobial interactionsmicrobiotapolymicrobial communitiespseudomonas putidarhizosphereT6SStype VI secretion system

Identifiers

PMID41036489
PMCPMC12482989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.