ReviewAdvanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
3D Genome Architecture in Stem Cell Lineage Commitment: from Structural Organization to Precision Regulation.
Review in Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune-evasive stem cells: engineering tolerance and reprogramming microenvironments for regenerative therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- ANKRD1 sustains a neurogenic BMSC niche and counters cognitive aging.International journal of oral science · 2026Article
- Epigenetic regulation in transplant rejection and tolerance: mechanisms and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- 3D Genome Architecture in Stem Cell Lineage Commitment: from Structural Organization to Precision Regulation.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cell lineage commitment is governed by intricate interactions between epigenetic mechanisms and 3D genome organization. Traditional linear epigenetics, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, cannot fully elucidate the complex spatiotemporal regulation of gene expression. Recent advances in spatial genomics technologies, such as high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), single-cell Hi-C, and Chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with Hi-C (Hi-ChIP), have provided unprecedented insights into genome architecture, revealing key structural units like chromatin compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), and chromatin loops. These structures dynamically reorganize during differentiation, influencing transcriptional accessibility and lineage-specific gene activation. Additionally, liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-mediated transcriptional condensates, such as transcription factories and super-enhancers, have emerged as essential regulators of gene expression patterns during cell fate transitions. The integration of multiomics data and artificial intelligence-driven predictive modeling further enhances the understanding of these regulatory networks. Despite ongoing technical challenges, including limitations in resolution, data complexity, and causal inference, recent advances continue to push the field forward. Engineered interventions such as CRISPR-based spatial genome editing and AI-powered computational platforms hold great promise for translating structural insights into targeted therapeutic strategies in regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.