ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Is hand grip strength a reliable indicator of clinical total knee arthroplasty outcomes?
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hand grip strength (HGS) is regarded as a reliable indicator of overall strength. It has been associated with various clinical outcomes, such as mobility following orthopedic surgery. Methods: This single-center prospective observational study of a cohort of patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis treated by means of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) looked into the subjects' baseline HGS, as well as their gait patterns, their function and their quality of life (QoL), both preoperatively and at one year after surgery. Results: The 119 patients analyzed exhibited a mean baseline HGS with the dynamometer handle at positions 2 and 3 of 23.9 ± 10.0 kg and 22.4 ± 9.4 kg, respectively. Significant low (r < 0.49) to moderate (r < 0.69) positive linear correlations were observed between baseline HGS and postoperative walking speed, right leg acceleration, and step length of both legs. However, no significant correlations were found with postoperative function or QoL variables. Patients with a postoperative walking speed ≥1 m/s had significantly higher baseline HGS scores than those with a postoperative walking speed <1 m/s (p < 0.05). Additionally, baseline HGS values of 18 and 20 kg (for handle positions 2 and 3, respectively) were established as cutoff points for achieving a postoperative walking speed ≥1 m/s, based on ROC analysis. Stratifying patients based on these thresholds, only those with baseline HGS <20 kg at handle position 3 presented with significant improvements on the KOOS symptom score (p = 0.037) and the KOOS overall score (p = 0.041). Conclusions: Baseline HGS showed certain associations with postoperative walking speed and step length, but not with postoperative function or QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.