ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2025
Artificial intelligence awareness, career resilience, job insecurity and behavioural outcomes.
Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-driven work systems and employee burnout: a systematic review of mechanisms, moderators, and a dynamic meta-system framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- From threat to strength: how AI usage is paradoxically associated with resilience among accounting and finance employees with perceived work meaningfulness as a mediating mechanism.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence anxiety: a narrative review of psychiatric conceptualization and clinical management.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2026Article
- AI Substitution Perception and Nurses' Active Learning Behavior: The Mediating Role of Job Insecurity and Moderating Role of Occupational Self-Efficacy.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: As artificial intelligence has developed over the years, it has significantly influenced society as it has assisted people with their everyday lives. However, from the workplace perspective as artificial intelligence can help increase performance, it can also allow employees to perceive that their jobs can someday be replaced by it. Thus, the study explored the proximal and distal outcomes of artificial intelligence awareness on job insecurity, task performance and deviant behaviour as well as the moderating role of career resilience for the relationship between artificial intelligence awareness and job insecurity. Method: Data were collected through a self-administered survey over three intervals. Participants were full-time office employees residing in South Korea. Results: This study found that job insecurity mediated the relationships between artificial intelligence awareness and both task performance and deviant behaviour. Furthermore, career resilience moderated the relationship between artificial intelligence awareness and job insecurity. Conclusions: Although technological advancements are intended to improve organisational outcomes, the study revealed that employees can develop negative perceptions of AI, leading to adverse workplace outcomes, such as increased job insecurity, deviant behaviour and decreased task performance. Furthermore, the study found career resilience to moderate the relationship between AI and job insecurity which then was found to mediate the model. These findings contribute to the existing literature and provide valuable insights for organisations aiming to mitigate the negative effects of AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.