ArticlePediatric discovery2025
Early Forays Into Using Spinal Anesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Surgery in Preterm Infants: A Retrospective Analysis From a Single Center in Karnataka.
Article in Pediatric discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonates, particularly those born preterm, have a higher incidence of inguinal hernia and are at increased risk of cardiopulmonary complications associated with general anesthesia. To mitigate these risks, spinal anesthesia has been adopted in our institution for over two decades as the preferred technique for inguinal hernia repair in neonates. This retrospective study presents a 6-year experience with neonatal spinal anesthesia and includes both term and preterm infants undergoing inguinal surgery. We specifically analyzed cases in which spinal anesthesia was used in neonates with a postconceptional age below 50 weeks. Nineteen patients underwent inguinal surgery under spinal anesthesia in this timeframe. The gestational age at birth ranged from 27 to 38 weeks. The postmenstrual age at the time of surgery ranged from 35 to 46 weeks. The birth weight ranged from 740 to 3300 g, whereas the weight at surgery ranged from 1550 to 4900 g. A 26G hypodermic needle was used to give the spinal block, and 0.2 mL/kg of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine was injected. No cases required respiratory support and/or inotropic support during the procedure and postoperatively. None had apnea during/after surgery, including the four cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. None required general anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair is a safe and efficient method that obviates the necessity for NICU admission or any escalation in respiratory care, including in the cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.